BEA Writer’s Convention Part Two

The crux of the whole thing is obviously the Pitch Slam. You can go anywhere and hear fantastic speakers talk about the things that were discussed in the various breakout sessions and speeches. You cannot find a room full of agents willing to listen to a horde of writers pitch their books anywhere but the BEA Writer’s Conference.

All in all I would say that the Pitch Slam went pretty much as I expected. I wish that it was a bit longer, I only got to speak to five agents in the two hours. Somehow the agents I wanted to talk to all had the longest lines and at 3 minutes a pop you burn through two hours fairly quickly.

My biggest disappointment of the trip was not being able to pitch to Janet Reid. I watched her during several panels and the Pitch Slam prep and I have to say she is as funny and clever in person as she is in her blog. That being said she was also the most sought after agent in the room. Her line when I first saw it held way over thirty people. It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that a line that size equals at least ninety minutes. I took a gamble and decided to pitch a few other agents whose lines were shorter then get into Janet’s line. Sadly at four thirty when I went to get into her line it was closed (and so was t lines for half the other agents I wanted to talk to.) I am still wondering if I made the right decision, but I need to get over that and concentrate on the agents I did speak with.

I am happy to say that two agents of my five were interested enough in my pitch to request more material. The other three will obviously hate it when I’m on the NY Times bestsellers list.

My two incredibly insightful agents were Sandy Lu of the L. Perkins Agency and Ginger Clark of Curtis Brown.  Both requested a synopsis and my first fifty pages. I am happy that I went to the Writer’s Digest Editors Intensive and already have had an editor look at my first fifty pages. I feel confident that they are strongly written and hopefully will get the agents interested in more. The synopsis is another story.

I haven’t written a synopsis. Anyone thinking of going to the BEA Writer’s Convention or any other place that allows you to pitch agents listen up. They tell you to finish your manuscript before you start to query or pitch your work well I’m going to add one more to that. Finish your synopsis. I have spent all weekend working on my synopsis and it turns out, synopsis writing is a bitch.

Imagine writing a book report on your book. Doesn’t sound fun does it. Trust me it isn’t. The worst part is I feel like I am scrambling to get it done. I want to strike while the iron is hot. I want to get this synopsis and my first fifty into these agents email inbox as quickly as possible, before they forget who the hell I am (not that I am that sure they’ll remember anyway they had to have met a lot of writers that day).

So if you are querying or pitching bite the bullet and write that synopsis today, you’ll be glad you did.

Okay wasted enough time blogging, now back to the bloody book report.

Tchuss

Lystra

Unnamed Writers Group of Reno

This weekend I attended a meeting of the Unnamed Writers Group of Reno (www.unnamedwriters.org). I am very excited to find a good writers group that meets close to my house. The group was extremely friendly and welcoming and wasted no time introducing me around to the other members and slapping a name tag on my chest.

As most writers are a bit introverted, even if we sometimes overcompensate and over extrovert to hide it, I think that they use precisely the right method of getting writers into the group. I didn’t feel like an outsider once at the meeting.

I met some very interesting writers, poets, and authors.  It is always good to be among peers. I could tell that the longtime members were all close friends but there was no cliquish vibe, which is all too common with social groups.

The highlight of the meeting was their guest speaker Gideon For-mukwai. Gideon (blog www.1xtramile.com) gave a presentation on using the new social networking tools for promoting yourself as an author. The topic was the same as the topic at the Writer’s Digest Editor’s Intensive but Gideon’s take on it was a little different.

Gideon faced the same knee jerk reaction of several technophobes in the crowd to the use of Facebook and Twitter as a tool to market yourself and your work. What I found remarkable was his use of anecdotal similes to illustrate how times are changing and while we may not like it, the tools at our disposal are ultimately for the better and we need to use them.

His stories got the point across to the nay sayers without having to resort to a confrontational dialog. When people have their already have their backs up about the Internet and you throw in web 2.0, Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, and blogs into the mix the last thing you want to have to do is beat them down with the same old, get on board or get out of the way rhetoric.

I will sum up the story that Gideon used to illustrate his point. I warn you that I will not do it justice as this story, like all good anecdotes, is intensely personal to him. Also Gideon is one of those gifted public speakers who have the charisma and ability to capture an audience and take them with him on a journey; everyone was entranced by his tale.

Here is his story (I am going to keep it short and sweet, if you ever get the chance ask Gideon to tell you the full story):

He grew up in a small town in Africa. When he was a boy they went to the river and used gourds to retrieve drinking water. This worked fine and everybody was happy.

Then they started to get plastic 5 liter containers. The containers were not as fragile as the gourds and worked better. Still many people didn’t like them. They complained that the water tasted bad or didn’t like losing their traditional method. Over time, as the benefits were realized, most people started using the plastic containers.

Years later a pipeline was installed. Water was processed and piped to people’s houses or central areas where people could access it. Again many people complained. Why should they pay to have pipes brought to their house when they could use their plastic containers to get water for free?

The analogy was hard to miss. Nobody in the room thought that piped and processed water was a bad thing.

With that simple story I think Gideon was able to bridge over to people who would have normally been bucking in protest.

Obviously everyone is talking about social networking right now. It is a very powerful tool, almost as powerful as piped water. I just wish that everyone had Gideon’s skill for explaining it to people whose initial reaction is one of fear and confusion.

I am very glad I went to the meeting and plan on joining the group, especially if the guest speakers continue to be of this caliber.

The Big Authonomy Question

When I went to the Writer’s Digest Editors Intensive one of the things that they talked about is www.Authonomy.com. It is a website developed by Harper Collins (Major Publisher) where writers can post up all or some of their work and get people to look at it. The best books are determined by the readers and the top books get looked at by Harper Collins’ editors. This is a big deal as Harper Collins does not accept direct submissions, you have to have an agent, and a good one at that, to get their editors to look at your work.

I am going to post the first part of my book Midnight In Vegas as soon as I get my cover art done. (You have to have a cover, I am working on mine, I’ll do a post on that later.) I am excited at this new way of getting noticed. Not only is Harper Collins reading the posts but other publishers and agents are scouring the site for new talent.

The big uproar at the moment however is all about a single book. It is called Lesser Sins by Vineet Bhalla. The buzz about this book isn’t about how good it is. It is about the author’s use of community to get it pushed, unfairly some people claim, to the top of the readers list.

Vineet, as it turns out, is a big time member of a online gaming group, a massive online gaming group. So when he posted his book he went online and told all his online buddies (like 800 or so) to go and vote for his book. Which they did. He went on YouTube and posted videos on how to do it. He went out and marketed his work like nobody else has ever done. He shot straight to number 1. Not on the merit of his book, but on the power of his community.

So the question is: Did he cheat?

I don’t think so. I think he was very, very clever. When I post up my book Midnight In Vegas on Authonomy I intend to announce it to everyone who will listen. I am sure that everyone who has posted anything on that site did the same thing. It is a popularity contest! It is stupid not to. They just didn’t take it to the level that Vineet did. 

I wish I had Vineet’s following. I am working on building one right now. I think what he did is genious, the man took the word platform and showed the world what it really means. The Internet is boundless, get used to it.

There is a great interview with Vineet on Lauri Shaw’s blog (http://www.laurishaw.com/vineet-bhalla-klazart-interviewed-about-authonomy/) I suggest that you read it.

I would like to say that coincidentally Lesser Sins is the first book I read on Authonomy when I signed up. Not because it’s popularity but because it has a great cover picture and the summary is excellent. I’ll save my opinion of the book’s content for another post.

So did Vineet achieve anything he wouldn’t have achieved without his community? I don’t think he did. I think he achieved it faster.

Ultimately his work and the work of every author will be judged by agents, editors and publishers before it gets published. They will NEVER give anyone a book deal because they have lots of on line friends who are willing to go do something that is absolutely free. His work has to stand on its own feet if it is going to go any further. What he received was attention, lots of it, and that can only be a good thing. It is all up to him and his work from here.

That is my opinion but I would like to hear what you think.

Writers Digest Editors Intensive

On March 21st and 22nd I attended the Writer’s Digest Editors Intensive in Cincinnati OH. The conference was a two day event. The first day was a full day seminar on writing and the second day was a one on one critique of your first 50 pages by a professional editor.

Obviously having a professional editor look at your work is a great hook and the reason I signed up for the conference. The surprising thing was how much I got out of the class on Saturday. I thought that the class would be a diversion for the main event, a one on one critique that had my heart pounding and palms sweating every time I thought about it. It wasn’t, it was really informative and changed the way I was thinking about getting published. The instructor for most of the day was Jane Friedman who did an excellent job of teaching a diverse group of people about how to use the internet to advance their writing careers. As I am a self professed geek and computer guy I am ashamed to admit that I hadn’t even begun to think about using the social networking sites out there to get my writing career going.

So now I am setting up my Facebook, writing this blog. Tweeting on twitter and developing a platform for myself to stand on and be seen above the crowd. Obviously this is all a big process but one that isn’t really that much work and hopefully will help me get published, which after all is the ultimate goal.

The review with the editor went extremely well. Overall he liked my work, had a few key suggestions for improving it and gave me a written critique. Considering how nervous I was before meeting the editor this was an awesome experience. I had expected him to shred my work, tear it apart, tell me everything was wrong. Before going in I had completely rewritten the first 50 pages again in my head, mercilessly chopping out more pages. Ironically the first comment my reviewer had was to add in something I had edited out before submitting it. That was invaluable to me. I fear that when I’m editing my own work I am overly critical and cut out too much. Scott proved that fear had some basis. Does that mean I shouldn’t cut anything out, no, absolutely not but I need to keep my fears in check while editing.

I have been working on my editing and finishing my book for a while now. I think the Editor’s Intensive showed the road I need to be travelling on to getting it done and getting it out there. For that I think that the experience was invaluable.

-Lystra

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.